Meyers, S. D., & Basu, S. (1999). Eddies in the eastern Gulf of Alaska from TOPEX/POSEIDON altimetry. J. Geophys. Res. , 104 (C6), 13333–13343.
Meyers, S. D., & O'Brien, J. J. (1995). Pacific Ocean influences atmospheric carbon dioxide. Eos Trans. AGU , 76 (52), 533.
Meyers, S. D., & O'Brien, J. J. (1998). Historical reconstruction of the 1868-1993 ENSO cycle using EOF climate basis functions. In 9th Conference on Interaction of the Sea and Atmosphere at the 78th American-Meteorogical-Society Annual Meeting (pp. 203–233).
Meyers, S. D., Basu, S., & O'Brien, J. J. (1997). Detection Of Eddies In The Eastern Gulf Of Alaska Using TOPEX/Poseidon Altimetry . COAPS Technical Report 97-4. Tallahassee, FL: Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies, Florida State University.
Meyers, S. D., Basu, S., & O'Brien, J. J. (1998). TOPEX/Poseidon altimetry captures cycles of the Indian Ocean. International WOCE Newsletter , 31 , 41–42.
Meyers, S. D., Melsom, A., & O'Brien, J. J. (1998). Ocean Variations the Eastern Gulf of Alaska Due to ENSO (K. Myers, Ed.). NPAFC Tech. Report.
Meyers, S. D., Liu, M., O'Brien, J. J., Johnson, M. A., & Spiesberger, J. L. (1996). Interdecadal Variability in a Numerical Model of the Northeast Pacific Ocean: 1970-89. J. Phys. Oceanogr. , 26 (12), 2635–2652.
Meyers, S. D., Melsom, A., Mitchum, G. T., & O'Brien, J. J. (1998). Detection of the fast Kelvin wave teleconnection due to El Niño-Southern Oscillation. J. Geophys. Res. , 103 (C12), 27655–27663.
Meyers, S. D., O'Brien, J. J., & Thelin, E. (1999). Reconstruction of Monthly SST in the Tropical Pacific Ocean during 1868-1993Using Adaptive Climate Basis Functions. Mon. Wea. Rev. , 127 (7), 1599–1612.
Michael, J. - P. (2010). ENSO Fidelity in Two Coupled Models . Master's thesis, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Abstract: This study examines the fidelity of the ENSO simulation in two coupled model integrations and compares this with available global ocean data assimilation. The two models are CAM-HYCOM coupled model developed by the HYCOM Consortium and CCSM3.0. The difference between the two climate models is in the use of different ocean general circulation model (OGCM). The hybrid isopycnal-sigma-pressure coordinate ocean model Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) replaces the ocean model Parallel Ocean Program (POP) of the CCSM3.0. In both, the atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) is used. In this way the coupled systems are compared in a controlled setting so that the effects of the OGCM may be obtained. Henceforth the two models will be referred to as CAM-HYCOM and CAM-POP respectively. Comparison of 200 years of model output is used discarding the first 100 years to account for spin-up issues. Both models (CAM-HYCOM and CAM-POP) are compared to observational data for duration, intensity, and global impacts of ENSO. Based on the analysis of equatorial SST, thermocline depth, wind stress and precipitation, ENSO in the CAM-HYCOM model is weaker and farther east than observations while CAM-POP is zonal and extends west of the international dateline. CAM-POP also has an erroneous biennial cycle of the equatorial pacific SSTs. The analysis of the subsurface ocean advective terms highlights the problems of the model simulations.
